• Electoral College in the 2000 Presidential election
  • The Electoral College (Why We Use It and Why It …
  • Electoral College (United States) - Wikipedia

07/03/2015 · Find out more about the history of Electoral College, including videos, interesting articles, pictures, historical features and more

This is due to the structuring of the Electoral College system in ..

The Case for the Electoral College,” thinks that the system …

What is the Electoral College? How does it work and what is its role in a US election?
And yet, what else can be done? Every four years we we hear calls to replace the Electoral College with plurality popular voting (the worst of all possible alternatives). But nothing happens. Nor will it soon, because one party — the Republican — benefits from the status quo.

U. S. Electoral College: Frequently Asked Questions

It turns out that the Electoral College, per se, is not what distorts the system so badly
As a result, the distribution of regional list seats in Gauteng was adjusted in the following manner: At the national level, the definitive allocation of National Assembly regional and national list seats in the 2004 general election was as follows: Since the recommendations presented by the ETT majority were never implemented, the 2009 general election was held under the existing electoral system.


The Electoral College - Controversial Elections

The architecture of the Electoral College, the House size effect, and the referendum paradox ☆
In modern practice, the Electoral College is mostly a formality. Most electors are loyal members of the party that has selected them, and in 26 states, plus Washington, D.C., electors are by laws or party pledges to vote in accord with the popular vote. Although an elector could, in principle, change his or her vote (and a few actually have over the years), doing so is rare.

It turns out that the Electoral College, per se, is not what distorts the system, yet democracy requires it to change. Most people believe we need a Constitutional Amendment to do so. This article offers a way to reform the Electoral College without passing a Constitutional Amendment.

Below is a list of some of the more controversial U

Yes, proportional allocation of electors might increase the likelihood that minor parties will win a few, lending increased credibility to the Libertarian and Green Parties, for example. So? This need not be unfair or disruptive. Certainly no more than we saw in 2000. More voices might even turn the Electoral College into something rather interesting, representing the diverse opinions of real Americans... perhaps even something befitting the name that the Founders gave it.

Electoral College Fast Facts | US House of …

If all states did this, the chance of an outrageous mismatch between electoral and popular results would be reduced. Large dissenting minorities might no longer feel quite as disenfranchised, and confidence in our system would improve.

U. S. Electoral College: Who Are the Electors? How Do …

So is the situation hopeless? Not really. It turns out that the Electoral College, per se, is not what distorts the system so badly. It is the winner-takes-all method of allocating each state's electors.

The Republic of South Africa Electoral System.

As the 2000 election reminded us, the Electoral College does make it possible for a candidate to win the popular vote and still not become president. But that is less a product of the Electoral College and more a product of the way states apportion electors. In every state but Maine and Nebraska, electors are awarded on a winner-take-all basis. So if a candidate wins a state by even a narrow margin, he or she wins all of the state’s electoral votes. The winner-take-all system is not federally mandated; states are free to allocate their electoral votes as they wish.

10 reasons why the Electoral College is a problem | MinnPost

What actually caused the ructions of 2000? Despite all the attention paid to "hanging chads" and questionable or biased election management in Florida, these were not key reasons for such a profound imbalance between the popular and Electoral College tallies. Far more telling was the effect of Ralph Nader's insurgent third party candidacy, drawing off more than enough votes from the left wing to deny Al Gore victory in several states. George W. Bush is unlikely to have been the Naderites' second choice. Yet, such is the system.