• Cancer research/vivisection lab, Canada.
  • This animal testing is called vivisection.
  • Vivisection is the practice of animal experimentation

Supporters of vivisection argue that animals are anaesthetised during procedures.

What is the difference between us and other creatures.

Vivisection is as repugnant as paedophilia

Vivisection has been carried out ever since the time humans developed knives.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) statistics (derived from researchers themselves) that only 6 to 8 percent of animals used in vivisection experience pain unrelieved by anesthesia or analgesia.

Evidence indicates, however, that many animal researchers fail to acknowledge - or even perceive - animal pain and suffering.

Therefore: (3) What we do to animals is morally wrong....

Governments have a very difficult decision on whether to ban vivisection or not.

You ask about my opinion on vivisection. I quite agree that it is justifiable for real investigations on physiology; but not for mere damnable and detestable curiosity. It is a subject which makes me sick with horror, so I will not say another word about it, else I shall not sleep to-night.


Vivisection has undoubtedly cost many children their lives.

Vivisection is one right that has gained more controversy than all the others.
Upon seeing the bandaged human-like creature the next day, Prendick thought Moreau was using vivisecting humans and that he is planning to experiment on him next....

How the animals are treated, or what tortures they have to face on a day to day basis.
Vivisection means the . However animals are dissected, infected with diseases, burned and blinded to name but a few of the atrocities that are inflicted on these poor defenseless animals.

You are unsure if it is day or night or what will happen to you next.

It will notsuffice here for advocates of the Benefits Argument to insist that “there areno alternatives” to vivisection that will yield as many human benefits. Notonly is this reply more than a little disingenuous, since the greatestimpediment to developing new scientifically valid non animal alternatives, andto using those that already exist, is the hold that the ideology of vivisectioncurrently has on medical researchers and those who fund them. In addition, thisreply fails to address the substantive moral issues. animals have rights is not a question that can be answeredby saying how much vivisection benefits human beings. No matter how great thehuman benefits might be, the practice is morally wrong if animals have rightsthat vivisection violates.

Animals in Science - American Anti-Vivisection Society

What the Scientists also fail to tell you is that advances such as curing cancer in mice has been in place for years, but cannot be transferred to humans.

New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Society

This page brings you the TRUTH about what goes on in Research Facilities. Animal Experimentation is disgustingly wrong, and must be stopped,NOW.

Vivisection | Definition of Vivisection by Merriam-Webster

The European parliament will on Monday debate a call – backed by a petition signed by 1.2 million people – to scrap animal research in the EU. The proposal has alarmed scientists, who worked for six years to set up the 2010 European directive that controls animal experimentation and welfare in the EU.